[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2012 17:00:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Noah Lavine <address@hidden> skribis:
> Unless there is going to be some other distinction between core and
> extensions, it would seem more natural to me to document everything by
> functionality, in the same part of the manual. Some sections would
> correspond to modules, because modules are also supposed to group
> things by functionality, but that would not be the rule for how the
> manual worked. What do you think?
I tend to agree, but then I’m not sure what a better sectioning would be
in practice. Any ideas?
Perhaps this could be worked out in ‘master’, so that node names don’t
change for 2.0.x.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/03
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/06
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/12
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/14
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/15
- Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, dsmich, 2012/05/14
Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15