Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

guile-devel (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu May 31 2012 17:27:42 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/30
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Mike Gran, 2012/05/30
  • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 2012/05/31
    • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/31
      • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 2012/05/31
      • Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/31
• The future of guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/27
• assembler in scheme, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/26
  • Re: assembler in scheme, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/26
    • Re: assembler in scheme, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/30
• Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 2012/05/24
  • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/25
    • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 2012/05/28
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/28
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/28
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 2012/05/29
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/29
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 2012/05/29
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/29
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Jan Synacek, 2012/05/30
      • Re: Build failures - compiling TeXmacs under guile 2.0.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/30
• Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.5-158-g15bb587, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/23
• Error in wip-rtl, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/22
  • Re: Error in wip-rtl, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/23
    • Re: Error in wip-rtl, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/27
• a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 2012/05/21
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Neil Jerram, 2012/05/21
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/22
    • Re: a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 2012/05/22
  • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/22
    • Re: a few proposed patches, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/22
    • Re: a few proposed patches, Ken Raeburn, 2012/05/22
      • Removing ‘GC_PTR’, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/25
  • Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/25
    • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/25
      • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/26
      • Re: Using labels-as-values on MacOS X, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/26
• problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/16
  • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/17
    • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/17
      • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/17
      • Re: problems evaluating code depending on version, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/17
• bug in syntax-case in master, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/16
  • bug in syntax-case in master, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/16
• terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/14
  • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/14
    • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/15
      • Re: terribly complex syntax objects in syntax parse, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/14
  • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
    • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/18
      • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/21
    • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/18
      • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/21
      • Re: how to implement mutual recursive parsers in syntax-parse, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/21
• Making every goops object applicable, Krister Svanlund, 2012/05/14
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/14
    • Message not available
      • Fwd: Making every goops object applicable, Krister Svanlund, 2012/05/14
    • Message not available
      • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Neil Jerram, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/16
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/15
  • Re: Making every goops object applicable, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/12
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/12
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/12
    • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/13
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/13
    • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/13
  • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2012/05/12
    • Re: [Proposal] Why not add a "shell" procedure?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/13
• Wish List, Sjoerd van Leent, 2012/05/11
  • Re: Wish List, Ian Price, 2012/05/11
• Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/11
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/11
    • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
  • Re: Register VM WIP, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/14
    • Re: Register VM WIP, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, David Kastrup, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/16
      • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
    • Re: Register VM WIP, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• GOOPs, MOP and slots, David Spångberg, 2012/05/11
  • Re: GOOPs, MOP and slots, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• SRFI 64 and SRFI 78, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/05/11
• Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/05/11
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/12
    • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/05/13
  • Re: SRFI-64 module and SRFI-78 module -- archive file attached, Sunjoong Lee, 2012/05/14
• patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/09
  • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
    • Re: patch to guile to allow c-code closure interaction for logic programming, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/22
• stack closures for guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/08
  • Re: stack closures for guile-log, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
    • Re: stack closures for guile-log, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/16
• syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/08
  • Re: syntax parse link, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
    • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/16
      • Re: syntax parse link, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/16
      • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/20
      • Re: syntax parse link, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/22
      • Re: syntax parse link, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/05/22
      • Re: syntax parse link, Alex Shinn, 2012/05/22
• Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/08
  • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/14
    • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/15
    • Re: Empty entries in $GUILE_LOAD_PATH, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
  • Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/14
    • Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/15
• Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/06
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/07
  • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
    • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Andreas Rottmann, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Psyntax security hole prevents secure sandboxing in Guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/08
• Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 2012/05/06
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 2012/05/06
    • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 2012/05/07
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/06
    • Re: Chunked Encoding, Ian Price, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Chunked Encoding, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/08
  • Re: Chunked Encoding, Daniel Hartwig, 2012/05/07
• Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/04
  • Re: Performance tracking, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/05
    • Re: Performance tracking, David Kastrup, 2012/05/05
      • Re: Performance tracking, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/05
      • Re: Performance tracking, David Kastrup, 2012/05/05
    • Re: Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/05
    • Re: Performance tracking, dsmich, 2012/05/05
      • Re: Performance tracking, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/06
      • Re: Performance tracking, dsmich, 2012/05/06
• Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/04
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
    • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/15
  • Re: Our temporary guildhall package repository down?, Andreas Rottmann, 2012/05/27
• Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/03
  • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/03
    • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 2012/05/04
      • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Daniel Krueger, 2012/05/06
      • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/09
      • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Patches for module/ice-9/occam-channel.scm, Daniel Krueger, 2012/05/18
• [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/02
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/03
  • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/06
    • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/07
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/12
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/14
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/14
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/15
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/15
      • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, dsmich, 2012/05/14
    • Re: [PATCH] Turn on more documentation, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/02
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Neil Jerram, 2012/05/04
    • Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
    • Re: our benchmark-suite, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
      • Re: our benchmark-suite, Neil Jerram, 2012/05/19
  • Re: our benchmark-suite, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/16
    • Re: our benchmark-suite, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/16
• Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/02
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/03
    • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/03
  • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Sjoerd van Leent, 2012/05/10
    • Re: Problems with compilation on Trisquel 5.5, Sjoerd van Leent, 2012/05/10
• Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/01
  • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/01
    • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/02
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/14
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/25
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/25
      • Re: Do you recognize these modules?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/25
• Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/01
  • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/05/01
    • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, dsmich, 2012/05/01
      • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/01
      • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/02
      • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Noah Lavine, 2012/05/02
      • Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch?, Andy Wingo, 2012/05/15
• Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/01
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/02
    • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/04
      • Re: [PATCH] Fix Ecmascript's tree-il compiling, Nala Ginrut, 2012/05/16
• Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/01
  • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 2012/05/05
    • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/05
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 2012/05/05
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/06
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Alex Shinn, 2012/05/07
      • Re: Who moderates the scheme-reports list?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/05/08

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc