[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:46 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100
>
> >> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
> >> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile?
> >
> > I don't know, you tell me. I sent several changesets in June,
> > in these messages:
>
> OK, will follow-up on guile-devel.
Thanks.
> >> The non-pthread code is used when Guile is built without pthread
> >> support. In that case, the async is queued directly from the signal
> >> handler.
> >
> > So why cannot this code be used by GDB?
>
> Because GDB uses whichever Guile is available. If the user has Guile
> built with pthread support, then that’s what GDB uses.
Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
without pthreads.
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/17
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/17
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/17
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/18
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- MinGW patches, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/18
- [PATCH] Remove unneeded HAVE_POSIX conditionals, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded HAVE_POSIX conditionals, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/22
- Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded HAVE_POSIX conditionals, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded HAVE_POSIX conditionals, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/26
- [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22