[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: Weak tables harmful to GC? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Oct 2017 21:20:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 |
+ else
+ {
+ /* The move to BDW-GC with Guile 2.0 introduced some bugs
+ related to weak hash tables, threads, memory usage, and the
+ alloc lock. We were unable to fix these issues
+ satisfactorily in 2.0 but have addressed them via a rewrite
+ in 2.2. If you see this message often, you probably want
+ to upgrade to 2.2. */
+ fprintf (stderr, "guile: warning: weak hash table corruption "
+ "(https://bugs.gnu.org/19180)");
+ len = 0;
+ }
Guess reverting this patch means this comment also should be amended!
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/10/09
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/21
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?,
Christopher Allan Webber <=
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/22
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/10/24
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/24
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/10/24
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/25
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26
- Re: Weak tables harmful to GC?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/26