Re: Should an enclosing let keep the compiler from handling define-module?

[Rob Browning]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> It seems misguided to try to use Scheme code to temporarily switch the
> current language to Scheme.  Doesn't this approach presuppose that
> Scheme is already the current language?

Or one that's "sufficiently similar".

I think in part I was originally confused because I didn't understand
say --language very well (or what changing the language actually
affected), and in the end I realized (I think) that it's a fairly blunt
instrument with fairly broad effects, and so I reworked what I was doing
to never explicitly change the current language, i.e. to rely on compile
#:from #:to and load-compiled-file, etc.

So if this doesn't seem like any real issue as far as Guile is concerned
right now, feel free to disregard.

And thanks for the response.
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4