[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer
|
From: |
spacecadet |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jul 2024 00:30:20 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
The question is: why would you do that?
Why not? :)
I'm trying to create a functional module system (similar to nixpkgs/nixos),
where modules are functions, imports are arguments, and exports are just the
return of the function.
Seems like scheme macros can't really work like that, although the suggestions
have given me a lot of help. Thank you.
- Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, spacecadet, 2024/07/24
- Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, Taylan Kammer, 2024/07/24
- Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, spacecadet, 2024/07/24
- Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, Attila Lendvai, 2024/07/24
- Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, Taylan Kammer, 2024/07/25
- RE: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer, Maxime Devos, 2024/07/26
- Re: Lexically bound macro, with lexically bound transformer,
spacecadet <=