[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 00/14] modular qt patches
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 00/14] modular qt patches |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:16:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:58:58PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I haven't checked if there's a good upstream source, but a good
> addition to the description could be: "This provides the qtsvg module"
> (for qtsvg), or "This package provides the qtconcurrent, qtcore, qtdbus,
> qtgui, qtopenglextensions, qtplatformheaders, qtplatformsupport,
> qtprintsupport, qtsql, qttest, qtwidgets, qtxml modules." (for qtbase).
The first one is a bit redundant, the second one useful. Maybe other packages
will also provide more than one module, then this text would be helpful.
I would suggest to capitalise them as in the library names, such as
"Qt5Concurrent" etc.. What do you think?
Concerning Mesa, I agree that it should probably not be propagated by
qtbase.
Andreas
- Re: [PATCH 02/14] gnu: Add qtimageformats., (continued)
[PATCH 08/14] gnu: Add qtsensors., Efraim Flashner, 2016/06/10
[PATCH 05/14] gnu: Add qtdeclarative., Efraim Flashner, 2016/06/10
[PATCH 03/14] gnu: Add qtx11extras., Efraim Flashner, 2016/06/10
[PATCH 10/14] gnu: Add qtwayland., Efraim Flashner, 2016/06/10
[PATCH 09/14] gnu: Add qtmultimedia., Efraim Flashner, 2016/06/10
Re: [PATCH 00/14] modular qt patches, Andreas Enge, 2016/06/12