guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling on CentOS 7.


From: Alex Kost
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compiling on CentOS 7.
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:39:42 +0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Tomáš Čech (2016-08-27 09:57 +0300) wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:48:36PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>>Dear Guix,
>>
>>Due to an old Automake version (1.13), running the `./configure' phase on
>>CentOS 7 fails with:
>>
>>> autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing
>>> configure.ac:21: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated, and 
>>> its use is discouraged.
>>> configure.ac:21: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P' 
>>> macro instead,
>>> configure.ac:21: and use '$(MKDIR_P)' instead of '$(mkdir_p)'in your 
>>> Makefile.am files.
>>> Makefile.am:422: warning: AM_GNU_GETTEXT used but 'po' not in SUBDIRS
>>> automake: error: cannot open < ./%D%/guix.texi: No such file or directory
>>> autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1
>>
>>(It does not replace %D% with the appropriate directory..)
>>
>>The attached patch replaces each instance of %D%, which I believe stands
>>for the current subdirectory from the project root, with the appropriate
>>directory.  With these changes, I've been able to compile GNU Guix on
>>CentOS 7.
>>
>>I am not sure how this change impacts custom configure options, so I
>>would like to ask someone with more Automake knowledge and experience to
>>elaborate on the possible downsides of applying this patch.
>>
>>If this change is acceptable to the project, I will update the commit
>>message to a more detailed and conforming message.  Suggestions are
>>welcome here though.
>>
>>What do you think about making Guix compilable on this "stable"
>>distribution? :-)
>
> I'd prefer to keep this patch in CentOS (or similar distribution with
> outdated software) as distro specific. I can assume that CentOS 8
> won't need it and you can just drop it for newer releases.

I also think this patch should stay on the CentOS side.  Roel, what you
suggest is a revert of commit c0d2e7b:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=c0d2e7b197a3c511eb1bf60b61ee6fdc673e36f4

-- 
Alex



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]