[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes! |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:43:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ping! :)
When replying to a days-old message, please consider quoting the
relevant bits. :-)
> I haven't run built packages much recently, but any idea what could be
> wrong? (Assuming there is anything wrong and it's not just me.)
I’m not sure what problem you’re referring to. What I can say is that
substitutes made starting from today are available as lzip. So for
example, if you run ‘guix pull’, the substitutes corresponding to the
various derivations of Guix (‘guix-cli’, ‘guix-base-packages’, etc.)
are available as lzip.
HTH!
Ludo’.
- Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/06/04
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/06
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/11
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/14
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/06/17
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/17
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Vincent Legoll, 2019/06/17
- Re: Testing needed for lzip substitutes!, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/06/17