[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Difference between Scintilla's license and ISC
From: |
Giovanni Biscuolo |
Subject: |
Re: Difference between Scintilla's license and ISC |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:04:41 +0200 |
Hello Guix!
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I think that the Scintilla license is non-free...
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:24:15PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and
>>> its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
>>>
>>> and the ISC license is:
>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for
>>> any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted,
>>
>> Notice the lack of the little word "with" in the first license.
>
> Interestingly, Debian includes Scite which includes code under the
> Scintilla license (see bottom):
>
>
> https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/scite/scite_3.7.2-1_copyright
The correct license name is "Historical Permission Notice and
Disclaimer", thanks to Wikipedia [1]
This is the GNU entry:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#HPND
the approved text is here:
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:HPND
and Scintilla uses that text AFAIU
I've added HPND to our gnu/licenses.scm and sent a patch, bug number
#36295; give me a go/no go please :-) (I can push it if needed)
Happy Guix! Gio'.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintilla_(software)
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature