[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time-machine broken from 2019-04-07 to 2019-05-04
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: time-machine broken from 2019-04-07 to 2019-05-04 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:56:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Konrad Hinsen <address@hidden> skribis:
> My impression is that tarballs are the preferred source code reference
> used in Guix today, with git commits used only when there is no release
> tarball. Is that an official policy, or just historical accident?
> If a policy, what's the reason for it?
There’s no real policy, other than to take a tarball when it contains
build system bits (typically when the tarball is made with GNU’s “make
dist”.)
Actually, we have more and more packages built from a Git checkout,
because this is becoming common practice.
I must say that the fact that SWH currently allows us to archive Git
checkouts more easily than tarballs gives a bit of an incentive to use
Git checkouts when there’s a choice.
Ludo’.