[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:50:50 +0300 |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:45:56PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I don't think Mesa is GNU, is it?
> Modern Mesa can only be built with LLVM as far as I get it.
>
There is some sort of graphical pipe-lining done in mesa using llvm.
(The tests for this are known to fail on non-Intel architectures).
That's why mesa pulls in llvm.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Emacs closure at ~900MB?, zimoun, 2020/09/22
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/22
- emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/26