Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

[Efraim Flashner]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:14:24PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we have now. Using
> > >> -frozen makes it a bit clearer that we're building it out.
> > >
> > > Good idea, I like it.
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > Would someone be willing to add a couple of lines about this in the
> > manual, next to the place where branching is mentioned?
> 
> Done in commit 175bea0ca42dba3e02109820efae0cac2804e73b

I don't think we still need to create the -next branch, staging and
staging-frozen seem like they should be enough.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature