Re: A new wip-emacs branch

[Leo Prikler]

Am Sonntag, den 04.04.2021, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen:
> On Sat, Apr 03 2021, Leo Prikler wrote:
> 
> > Your patch LGTM in a vaccum (except that package-version this-
> > package
> > could be abbreviated to just "version" IIUC), but I went for a
> > different fix, since emacsql tried to avoid redundancies by putting
> > in
> > other redundancies.
> > 
> > I ran a small test with emacs-emacsql-sqlite on
> > 2be3daa19d2fd47933c622995d2f2dde714075e6, but please try it for
> > yourself and check whether everything works as you expect it to.
> 
> Thanks for fixing the problem, but now I noticed that 'emacs-pdf-
> tools'
> doesn't build.
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> starting phase `emacs-add-source-to-load-path'
> Backtrace:
>            7 (primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/g7vcnpqrs3p76qm9xrnm1sz65ss…")
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>    191:35  6 (_ _)
> In guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
>     838:2  5 (gnu-build #:source _ #:outputs _ #:inputs _ #:phases .
> #)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1736:10  4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>    857:16  3 (every1 #<procedure 7ffff2b447c0 at guix/build/gnu-bui…> 
> …)
> In guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm:
>    847:30  2 (_ _)
>    847:30  1 (_ _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1669:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> Wrong type to apply: #f
> note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-emacs-pdf-tools-0.90-
> 1.c510442.drv-0'
> builder for `/gnu/store/d992q7cfb1wlfffg15g7bgsa32qjanrm-emacs-pdf-
> tools-0.90-1.c510442.drv' failed with exit code 1
> build of /gnu/store/d992q7cfb1wlfffg15g7bgsa32qjanrm-emacs-pdf-tools-
> 0.90-1.c510442.drv failed
> View build log at
> '/var/log/guix/drvs/d9/92q7cfb1wlfffg15g7bgsa32qjanrm-emacs-pdf-
> tools-0.90-1.c510442.drv.bz2'.
> guix build: error: build of
> `/gnu/store/d992q7cfb1wlfffg15g7bgsa32qjanrm-emacs-pdf-tools-0.90-
> 1.c510442.drv' failed
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> The attached patch fixed the problem for me.
> 
I pushed your patch with some slight cosmetic changes.  Thanks!