[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions regarding Python packaging
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
Subject: |
Re: Questions regarding Python packaging |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:01:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Am 29.06.21 um 09:20 schrieb
Lars-Dominik Braun:
AFAIK this might not be true if other build systems not using setuptools
at all might show up. And isn't this the main reason for all your work?
No, try
Sorry, I've been inprecise on this:
There might still be quite some packages out there importing
plain, old distutils (and not setuptools) in their setup.py. These
are what I meant with "other build systems not using setuptools".
For these setup.py to understand the options we (and pip) need for
installation, "import distutils" has to be hacked to actually
become "import setuptools" - which is what setuptools-shim does
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |