[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?
|
From: |
Maxime Devos |
|
Subject: |
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:32:54 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 01-09-2021 om 23:47 [+0200]:
> > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-download.html
> Imo the only thing awkard about guix download is that it only handles
> tarballs when a large chunk of packages use some sort of version
> control. We might want to look over that at some point and specify
> revisions/commits to download on the command line.
jgart sent a patch to implement this for git:
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50274#0>.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, (continued)
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Jonathan McHugh, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?,
Maxime Devos <=
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Jonathan McHugh, 2021/09/02
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/02
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/02
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Sarah Morgensen, 2021/09/03
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Sarah Morgensen, 2021/09/03
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/08