[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:11:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Doesn't seem to reach some kind of consensus, or maybe there's actually
some consensus for considering APSL-2.0 acceptable (albeit suboptimal)
for Guix but I'm to biased to see it :p, so I suppose continue with
status quo (i.e.: allow APSL-2.0)?
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, (continued)
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Philip McGrath, 2022/06/16
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, zimoun, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Felix Lechner, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, zimoun, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Philip McGrath, 2022/06/17
- Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0,
Maxime Devos <=
Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/17