Re: xpip install -U 'xonsh[full]'

[Maxime Devos]

On 25-07-2022 00:29, jgart wrote:
> When installing xonsh I get the following after starting:
>
> ```
> You are currently using the readline backend. For interactive tab-completion, 
> on-the-fly syntax highlighting, and more, install prompt_toolkit by running:
>
>    xpip install -U 'xonsh[full]'
>
> ```
>
> How should Guix handle optionally installing xonsh[full]?

I guess it could ask to install it with Guix instead. It's a bit 
complicated with the multiple mechanisms (guix install, guix home, "guix 
shell foo bar -- baz"), but that can be avoided by patching it to 
rephrase it a bit:

```
You are currently using the readline backend. For interactive 
tab-completion, on-the-fly syntax highlighting, and more, install the 
'python-prompt-toolkit' package.
```

OTOH, from what I've gathered from previous discussions, some people 
want "guix build --source" to be the unmodified source code, with as 
only exception non-freeness removal, so patching would be out. E.g., 
doing the "-O1" bugfix in the shepherd package as a patch (well, 
snippet, but same thing basically) was rejected by some people in 
<https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54216#5>

But at the same time, we patch glibc, gcc and guile-fibers without any 
complaints while those are more complicates patches and (in case of 
glibc and gcc), even Guix-specific, while the shepherd patch is simple 
and non-Guix specific.

(I don't understand anything from those discussions)

Greetings,
Maxime.

OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature