[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hackathon: fix build errors on the "master" branch.
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: Hackathon: fix build errors on the "master" branch. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:23:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.12.2; emacs 29.3 |
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> for the past weeks the "master" branch has been in pretty poor state
>> according to ci.guix.gnu.org. It keeps hovering at around 56% progress,
>> which is a far cry from the 80+% we used to have in the old days.
>>
>> A lot of packages are in fact broken. Many more are marked as broken
>> due to a bug affecting ci.guix.gnu.org.
>>
>> It would be a good idea to do a little spring cleaning and go through
>> the dashboard for the master branch and work on fixing builds that are
>> currently broken on x86_64-linux. (Other architectures are in worse
>> state, but fixing x86_64-linux may be something we can actually
>> accomplish.)
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Using the QA¹ page we can see another data point of how the different
> architectures are doing. Also, assuming there are 30,000 packages, the
> 4.3% difference on bayfront between x86_64 and i686 would be 129
> packages. Given how easy it is to build for i686 on x86_64 I'd suggest
> also going through some of the i686 packages which don't build and
> checking if there's a build failure that can be patched or if it's a
> case of the software not supporting 32-bit architectures.
>
> ¹ https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/master
I get 1290 as 4.3% of 30000, and that matches up better with the 1551
results I see here for things that are available from bordeaux, but not
from ci:
https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/ddf3759645ba76ef532658a257ae74fe0b1788b5/package-derivation-outputs?search_query=&substitutes_available_from=2&substitutes_not_available_from=1&output_consistency=any&system=x86_64-linux&target=none&field=no-additional-fields&after_path=&limit_results=&all_results=on
You can also ask the data service about failing builds, although it only
knows about bordeaux builds:
https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/ddf3759645ba76ef532658a257ae74fe0b1788b5/package-derivations?search_query=&system=x86_64-linux&target=none&minimum_builds=&maximum_builds=&build_status=failing&field=builds&after_name=&limit_results=&all_results=on
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature