[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01)
From: |
Luis Felipe |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Differentiate products more clearly (Cycle 01) |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:47:18 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
El 6/08/24 a las 10:26, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) escribió:
Hello Luis.
I very much like your Guix download page mock-ups that make the download
pages give clear instructions. They avoid referring to the manual; this
is better at least to many users (who currently probably download the
Guix tarball before they learn it was useless).
Thanks for the feedback, Florian. I'll consider sending patches for
these then.
The question of wording is if it would be an improvement to use terms
popularized elsewhere. I have opinions, but perhaps I’m wrongly
conservative in this regard.
Guix is all about packages, therefore it is a package manager. I
believe the shell and container and system, home support are still about
packages. Despite other package managers not doing it.
Yeah... Well, and I guess there's not much interest in changing the
definition anyways. So :)
Also you write in the system download page mock-up, Guix System were a
distribution of the GNU operating system. I believe this is wrong; Guix
(not Guix System) is a distribution of the GNU operating system.
The definition of OS should not be something like Windows, running on
top of an IBM Bios or Intel Management Engine.
Thanks, I'll take that into account for the patches.
OpenPGP_0x0AB0D067012F08C3.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature