> At the same time it is not really meant as a general
> notification
> system, so usefulness for you depends on whether some
> committer will
> merge the commit adding librewolf team (with you in it).
Ian, what about teaming up with other Firefox derivative
maintainers?
I’m thinking notably of André and Clément who’ve worked on Tor
Browser
on Mullvad Browser, Mark H Weaver who’s been maintaining
IceCat, and
perhaps Jonathan who’s been taking care of IceDove (Cc’d)?
Of course, each of these package is different but they’re in
the same
area so it probably makes sense to share reviewing efforts
here.
I was reticent on this mainly because (i) I have never actually
used
LibreWolf and I don't have a clear picture of it besides it
being a
"Firefox + Arkenfox - Mozilla Branding" [1](?); (ii) I expect
that most
of these security (aka urgent) patches will land on the same day
on a
regular basis for all 4 browsers and given Mullvad and
TorBrowser
sources will be late in the game, I'll probably not be able to
do such
a timely (yet again, urgent) review, which could add to Ian's
frustration, instead of relieving it; and (iii) AFAIUI,
LibreWolf moves
at a faster pace, which adds to my concern of not being able to
keep up
in the long run.
That being said, given those patches have remained unreviewed
for weeks
in a row, I guess I can at least help improve the current
situation and
give commiters some more confidence that a given patch will not
break
hell loose when commited and so I'm willing to help with these
reviews.
However, I cannot promise to maintain it if/when Ian's lead
happens to
go missing.