[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon
From: |
Kaelyn |
Subject: |
Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:05:58 +0000 |
On Thursday, August 29th, 2024 at 12:53 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
wrote:
>
>
> Ludovic Courtès ludo@gnu.org skribis:
>
> > If there are no objections, I’d like us to go ahead and rebase/merge
> > ‘core-updates’ tomorrow, Friday 30th, after adding an entry in
> > ‘etc/news.scm’ (I can do that but I won’t mind if somebody else does; we
> > can coordinate on IRC and/or here.)
>
>
> Here’s a proposed news entry:
>
> (entry (commit "XXX")
> (title
> (en "Core packages updated"))
> (body
> (en "Core packages have been updated, in particular those that
> are used to build every other package in the distribution. Noteworthy
> upgrades include:
>
> @itemize
> @item @code{glibc} 2.39 (was 2.35);
> @item @code{gcc} 11.4.0 as the default compiler (was 11.3.0);
> @item @code{binutils} 2.41 (was 2.38);
> @item @code{make} 4.4.1 (was 4.3);
> @item TeX@tie{}Live 2024.2 (was 20230313);
> @end itemize
>
> Additional improvements were made to the build system and related
> packages and tools:
>
> @itemize
> @item
> the @code{glibc} package now includes the @code{C.UTF-8} locale,
> suitable for use when a UTF-8-capable is necessary regardless of any
Overall the news entry looks good to me. However, you have a missing word on
the above line--it reads "when a UTF-8-capable is necessary", and I believe it
should read "when a UTF-8-capable locale is necessary".
Cheers,
Kaelyn
> language or regional convention;
> @item
> origins that include patches are now repacked with zstd instead of xz,
> which uses less CPU power and memory, both when compressing and when
> decompressing;
> @item
> @code{copy-recursively} has a new @code{#:select?} parameter.
> @end itemize
>
> If you encounter any problem, please check
> @url{https://issues.guix.gnu.org} for existing reports and resolutions;
> email @email{bug-guix@@gnu.org} to report new bugs.")))
>
> Did I forget anything important here?
>
> If not, translations welcome!
>
> Ludo’.
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, (continued)
Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Ricardo Wurmus, 2024/08/22
Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Roman Scherer, 2024/08/22
Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, nathan, 2024/08/25
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, John Kehayias, 2024/08/25
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/08/28
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/08/29
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/08/29
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon,
Kaelyn <=
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Nicolas Goaziou, 2024/08/29
- Re: Merging ‘core-updates’ real soon, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/08/30
- ‘core-updates’ merged! 🎉, Ludovic Courtès, 2024/08/31
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merged! 🎉, Tomas Volf, 2024/08/31