Re: Request-For-Comment process: concrete implementation (v5)

[Suhail Singh]

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> During the Discussion Period, we discuss, all.  The aim of Supporter is
> to keep the RFC on track.  Especially, to let space and time to all to
> express their voice.  Nix names this Role: Shepherd.  Maybe it captures
> better the idea.
>
> Then during the Deliberation Period, team members reply “I support”.

"Shepherd", imo, is a better name.  One, it evokes the image of someone
guiding others (which is apt).  Two, it uses a different term than what
team members use to voice their consensus (thereby avoiding confusion
with simply voicing agreement/consensus).

-- 
Suhail