[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-fi
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] services: network-manager: Add extra-configuration-files field. |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:47:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 |
Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name> writes:
>> > this patch failed to get any attention in two weeks
>>
>>
>> Two weeks isn't a long time in free software projects. A more common
>> time frame would be between one year and eighteen months.
>
>
> ...and with such a delay most patches bitrot beyond recognition, then
> after one too many burdensome rebase the contributor gives up, and
> then the whole thing gets forgotten.
I agree. Let's not normalize long delays.
Pinging is, in fact, encouraged.
We're still in the slow process of forming self-organized teams that
cover a manageable amount of packages/files and have enough dedicated
committers to review patches. This works fine for some of our
sub-communities, but for others it still doesn't.
Once the community grew beyond a size where I recognized each and every
contributers the problems of structurelessness have become painfully
obvious. It is not something we want people to get used to, but it's
also not something a handful of people can fix by decree.
Speaking for myself: I burned out a few years ago and haven't recovered
even a fraction of my capacity today. This is something we really want
to avoid, and ideally people would self-organize around committers they
know, who can champion their contributions --- instead of calling for
the proliferation of private channels, a different kind of unmanageable
structurelessness.
--
Ricardo