Re: Non-committers can't keep authenticated forks updated

[Tomas Volf]

Saturanya Rahjane de Lasca <saturanya@dismail.de> writes:

>> Again, not disputing that things work fine for people with commit
>> access. Perhaps that is part of why this issue hasn't been addressed
>> before :P
> You may call us privileged – and yes, we are – but that doesn't change
> the fact that weakening security weakens security.

Just to be explicit here, this whole thread was motivated by desire to
simplify soft-forks while keeping the same level of security.  No one
here is arguing for weakening it.

Tomas

-- 
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature