guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cgit disabled on Savannah


From: John Kehayias
Subject: Re: Cgit disabled on Savannah
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:40:30 +0000

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 09:04 PM, Munyoki Kilyungi wrote:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> aliandika:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In case you haven’t seen it, cgit is disabled (permanently?) on
>> Savannah:
>>
>>   https://hostux.social/@fsfstatus/113845788160755310
>>
>> Ludo’.
>>

That's disappointing; I found it a quick way to browse the log, commits,
and code often. The gitweb interface is still up:
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guix.git>.

> Also, downloading the git installer from git craps
> out.  See:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ╭─munyoki@saitama ~
> ╰─➤  wget https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/plain/etc/guix-install.sh
> --2025-01-20 21:03:04--
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/plain/etc/guix-install.sh
> wget: /home/munyoki/.netrc:1: unknown token
> "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b"
> Resolving git.savannah.gnu.org (git.savannah.gnu.org)... 209.51.188.78, 
> 2001:470:142:6::78
> Connecting to git.savannah.gnu.org 
> (git.savannah.gnu.org)|209.51.188.78|:443... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 429 Too Many Requests
> 2025-01-20 21:03:05 ERROR 429: Too Many Requests.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Perhaps related?

That would be my guess. I think I saw a report of that yesterday on
#guix. I'm assuming it is from following the Binary Installation
instructions at
<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html>.

So, assuming the gitweb interface stays up, we could replace the link
with
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guix.git;a=blob_plain;f=etc/guix-install.sh;hb=HEAD>.
Or maybe there is a better way to wget that file? And while we're at it,
we should provide a hash for that to be verified against, no?

John




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]