[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-
From: |
Alatalo Toni |
Subject: |
RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...") |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:58:08 +0200 (EET) |
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Danny Ayers wrote:
> Hmm, I'm sure you have good reason to use something other than URIs for
afaik the cryptographic content hash forms the URI (urn-5)
> nodeA graphics:x "17"
> nodeA graphics:x "18"
> even if nodeA is a URI
yes this is new to us after zz ..
(zzstructure uses clones for that)
> so some kind of contextualization is needed anyway. So the lines along which
exactly.
> I was thinking were more like :
> canvasX{
> nodeA graphics:x "17"
> }
>
> canvasY{
> nodeA graphics:x "18"
> }
but quite often with rdf one node may be in several places on one canvas,
with the views we are using that is. or did i miss the point here?
> vocab. Anyhow, I'm still tinkering with much cruder stuff at present though,
> plenty of time to think about this...
i guess that's good, too :)
(and there is much for us as well)
> Cheers,
> Danny.
to you too,
~Toni
- [Gzz] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/08
- Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- TM... (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/08
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/08
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."),
Alatalo Toni <=
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/08
- urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Kevin Keck, 2003/03/10
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Tuomas Lukka, 2003/03/10
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/10