[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-
From: |
Alatalo Toni |
Subject: |
RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...") |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:26:59 +0200 (EET) |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Danny Ayers wrote:
> > > Do you have an example of this? I'm having trouble thinking
> > where this might
> > A
> > |
> > B-A
> Still having trouble :-(
i'm sorry, that was a bad example -- i should have tried to explain.
i did try to construct a more meaningful one, which i try to repeat below.
otherwise there's a screenshot how a situation like this occurred to me
when i was working today, but it's not a very good one (yet). bu do feel
free to see http://an.org/fenfire/gzigzag.png and the difference to
gzigzag2.png (which is not there yet but i try to make it when have time
:)
fortunately, your question is helpful to answer:
> What does this offer that
> A-B
> doesn't? When might it be useful in practice?
if y and x axis are (sematically) different.
you could reconstruct it in rdf by saying:
A y B
B x A
(which is the order i do them in hierarchical trees in zzstructure,
when y and x are simply d.1 and d2. (using d.clone in the z-axis)
so in a rdf graph it might appear as:
A
|
|-x
|
B---A
|
y
where A is the same node in differenct places on one canvas. (m.o.t.?)
> Cheers,
> Danny.
wishfully,
~Toni
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), (continued)
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/08
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/08
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/08
- urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Kevin Keck, 2003/03/10
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Tuomas Lukka, 2003/03/10
- Re: urn-5 vs hashes (was: Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based...")), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."),
Alatalo Toni <=
- Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Danny Ayers, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Alatalo Toni, 2003/03/11
- Re: [Gzz] RE: [ba-ohs-talk] Fenfire, RDF (re "Towards a Standard Graph-Based..."), Benja Fallenstein, 2003/03/08
- [Gzz] Obituary and Re-birth, Rod Welch, 2003/03/08