[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Pegs
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Pegs |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:45:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:32:42PM +0200, Asko Soukka wrote:
> Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tuomas Lukka kirjoitti:
> > Ok, who would volunteer to move all PEGs to their relevant projects?
> >
> > Asko: this might be a job for you because it is related to navidocizing
> > the projects.
>
> Ok. This was the reason to make pegboard work as close to independent
> docutils directive as possible.
>
> Problem: UMLs don't yet compile in navidoc, need still some work. Is it
> OK, that I move PEG ASAP UMLs compile? Though, UML needs a alot of work
> anyway. I.e. package names have changed. Linking is a another problem,
> since we probably want diagrams to crosslink between projects.
I'd actually prefer sooner; not having the PEG stuff working, even without
UMLs is crippling our process.
> Well, As said, I'm working for this, progressing and learning slowly the
> differences between Java and python package/object model :)
;) Have fun... And remember also jython sometimes screws up badly.
But it'd probably be best to just move the PEG *files* *NOW*...
Tuomas