Re: [Gzz] Re-Re-Re-Repost: PEG nodeview_abstract

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:30:47PM +0300, Matti Katila wrote:
> =====================================================================
> PEG nodeview_abstract--mudyc: Abstract node view, context and content
> =====================================================================
> 
> :Author:   Matti Katila
> :Stakeholders: Matti Katila
> :Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/04/04 11:18:30 $
> :Revision: $Revision: 1.8 $
> :Status: Incomplete  
> 
> 
> Introduction
> """"""""""""
> 
> This PEG includes three abstract which are

What's an abstract? Could you split this PEG physically, so that
each of the proposals below is a single PEG?

MegaPEGs are bad, as they're much harder to discuss; it's far easier
to discuss small pieces (though large enough to understand the context) first.


        Tuomas