[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Paperbot status
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Paperbot status |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2003 15:39:11 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:17:05PM +0300, Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:10:21PM +0300, Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
> > > Is Paperbot now what you wanted it to be? Asko added me a task about
> > > conducting some studies using Paperbot - who's got stakes on this?
> >
> > Everyone... It's PR.
>
> I meant about the studies.
Ahhh, sorry, misread. Asko, jvk, me, but I think probably we'll look
at it after HT03 DL.
> > I think let's not spend any more time on features, but more explanation
> > would be good.
>
> If we are to carry out some research experiments, we would need some
> features for that.
>
> - [humppake] Paper experiments CGI application to Himalia:
> - IDEA: gives two paper to the user, user selects the
> more appealling one according to 1) colors or 2) textures.
> These should maybe be distinct applications.
Yes, this is what we want in the long term.
> > Where is the text stored, i.e. where can we edit it?
> > A reference to an on-line preprint of the Paper article would be good.
>
> I could add index.html and the CGI script to some CVS module. But I'd like
> to move the configuration variables out of the script first and have
> someone review the code.
Well, the review will be easier once it's in CVS..
Isn't the general idea here that we'll do nothing outside CVS unless
there is a really important reason; what's the reason here?
Tuomas
Re: [Gzz] Paperbot status, Janne Kujala, 2003/05/19