[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah p
From: |
Hermanni Hyytiälä |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Re: [Gzz-commits] storm/doc/pegboard/attacking_gisp--hemppah peg.rst |
Date: |
11 Jun 2003 13:39:49 +0300 |
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:22, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:17:32AM +0300, Hermanni Hyytiälä wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 21:28, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Again, Chord paper cites, "Each peer in an experiment picked a random
> > > > set of keys to query from the system, and we measured the path length
> > > > required to resolve each query."
> > > >
> > > > So, I'll use the same method...
> > >
> > > Once or several times?
> >
> > The authors used in tests a network with n=2^k peers, where k varied
> > from 3 to 14.
> >
> > So, several times (and the number of peers in the system varied).
> >
> > Is this ok for us ?
>
> I meant: does each peer try to get the set of keys it chose once or several
> times?
>
> Tuomas
The authors do not mention it. However, since the network they used in
the simulation was *static* (no "harmful" factors") and the purpose of
the simulation was just to measure lookup lengths we can assume that
each peer queried keys only once.
(OTOH, with the fault tolerant simulation (concurrent joins/leaves) they
do state that queries are not retried.)
-Hermanni