[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cfengine] Resolve and purging
From: |
Bas van der Vlies |
Subject: |
Re: [Cfengine] Resolve and purging |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:19:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 |
Chip Seraphine wrote:
The docs list this as a feature, so I'm sending this grumble to help- instead
of bugs-.
The resolve: section really needs some sort of purge attribute. The syntax of
it make it very nice for maintaining the resolver, but it's inability to
remove lines make it impractical; you end up having to use editfiles: or
copy: instead. Editfiles is clumsy for maintaining entire files and copy:
isn't a good choice when your basic assumption is that your network
configuration is hosed.
Before I go about writing/submitting a patch with a 'PurgeResolver' variable,
is there a known reason why it (currently) won't delete lines? I agree that
it is reasonable default behavior, but making it mandatory severely limits
the usefulness of resolve: to environments where old DNS servers never get
decommissioned, nobody every makes typos, DNSs are never re-IP'd, etc. This
makes me think that the thinking behind this limitation is grounded in
reasons other than technical, so I'd like to get some clarification lest I
submit a patch that will just be shot down....
You have my vote. I was also ending up with old lines in my resolv.conf
and switched to copy/editfiles sequence. I can not think of a reason for it.
--
--
********************************************************************
* *
* Bas van der Vlies e-mail: basv@sara.nl *
* SARA - Academic Computing Services phone: +31 20 592 8012 *
* Kruislaan 415 fax: +31 20 6683167 *
* 1098 SJ Amsterdam *
* *
********************************************************************
- Resolve and purging, Chip Seraphine, 2003/11/25
- Re: [Cfengine] Resolve and purging,
Bas van der Vlies <=