[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:27:01 +0100 (MET) |
On 22 Jan, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Systems Administrator wrote:
>>- Network interface setup. I wanted to be able to set up multiple
>> virtual network interfaces with different IPs, based on the
>> primary IP. I integrated this into the Package Management
>> software above, since it already had a hosts table, and just
>> needed an Interfaces table
>
> I did this with a hideous amount of editfiles which I should probably
> script; it's very prone to errors and generates a lot of stress when
> people edit.
interfaces: ?
>
>>- Service Management. I wanted something that would do the
>> following pseudocode:
>> if(! service started) { start service }
>
> I use a combination of processes: and shellcommands to check if the
> daemon is running, and if not define a class to restart it and do a
> chkconfig on.
>
Restart in processes?
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?, Jamie Wilkinson, 2004/01/22
Re: Other possible cfengine weak areas?, David Douthitt, 2004/01/22