[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the cu
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
Subject: |
Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:35:49 +0900 |
Hello,
Unfortunately, there is currently no maintainer for this.
I'm rather thinking of using Universal ctags in the future.
The reason for thinking so is
o Universal ctags can be used as a plug-in parser of gtags(1).
o Universal ctags is well maintained.
o Little known, but Universal ctags can treat references.
However, there is no parser which uses that function yet.
Either way, what's missing is the parser writer.
Regards,
Shigio
2021年2月25日(木) 1:29 Gautam Thaker <ghthaker@gmail.com>:
>
>
> In release notes for 6.6.5 I read:
>
> [DEPRECATED]
> o gtags: the built-in C++ parser is deprecated, since it is not well
> maintained.
> Currently, it is hard to say that GLOBAL supports C++ language.
>
> What is state of C++ support? I really like being able to have my
> global/gtags/ggtags.el eco-system provide me C++ definitions AND references
> (where methods/functions are being called from.) universal-ctags, I don't
> believe it can find references.
>
> What is the state of C++ support and what is the likely future?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shigio@gnu.org>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F 1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB