Re: [Help-glpk] Re: producing PDF documentation

[Andrew Makhorin]

> Thank you for asking. It seems to be OK on my machine, the fi-s are
> searchable, etc.

> Just one question: why did you remove the function names from the
> table of contents?

It seemed to me that without routine names the TOC looks better
(probably because I do not need to consult the reference manual :).

> I just loved the old documentation, it was enough to have a quick look
> at the TOC and i knew which function to use.

> In am not able to do that in the new one, very hard to find the
> function name i am looking for so i still use the old docs.

Okay, I will make a new edition with the names.

> It would be handy to have links also to the corresponding pages,
> though i do not know how much work that would be or portability issues
> etc. If it is a dumb proposal, please forget it.

The new edition of the reference manual in pdf format will be provided
with hyperlinks in the TOC.