Re: [Help-glpk] Can you help me?

[Michael Hennebry]

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Ali Baharev wrote:

> There is nothing wrong.
>
> It seems to me you have chosen the bounds to be the minimum and
> maximum value for a 32-bit signed integer.
>
> But your bounds are converted to double precision variables, and GLPK
> checks bounds accordingly, the relative error is less than 1.0e-9
> which is OK.
>
> You can force GLPK to treat your variables as integers and if that is
> what you need.

Not good enough.
The answer given is all integer.
'Twould be necessary to give GLPK a flag that
requires an error less than about .23E-9.

> I could not understand the purpose of your example, it has an analytic solution.

--
Michael   address@hidden
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."