[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Klaus Berndl |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
12 Sep 2002 10:29:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
On 11 Sep 2002, Jochen Küpper wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2002 10:34:06 +0200 Klaus Berndl wrote:
>
> Klaus> AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer
> Klaus> ported from Cygwin to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs
> Klaus> must still be installed by downloading one big archive
> Klaus> (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled binaries),
> Klaus> extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
>
> Actually Emacs is (3 packages) in the standard Cygwin install nowadays...
Oooops... AFAIK there is no official release port of GNU Emacs to Cygwin...
Is this not true anymore?? Is there now an official port of GNU Emacs 21.X to
cygwin (downloadable binaries build with cygwin and installable by the cygwin
setup)?
Ciao,klaus
--
Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de
sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, (continued)
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/09/10
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?,
Klaus Berndl <=
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?, A. L. Meyers, 2002/09/14