Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?

[Ilya Zakharevich]

[A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to
Stefan Monnier 
<foo@acm.com>], who wrote in article <5lwup7kw31.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu>:
> >> >        font: -Cronyx-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--15-140-75-75-C-90-RAWIN-R
> [...]
> > ???  I do not use that font.  How many times should I repeat that tt
> > is *Emacs* who choses this font?  My resources for fonts are
> 
> But there is no `cronyx' or `rawin-r' anywhere in the code of Emacs, so it
> must get some "help" from somewhere in order to choose this font.
> Normally for charset <foo> it looks for fonts with names of the form
> *-...-*-*-<foo>, so there has to be something somewhere that tells Emacs to
> use `rawin-r'.
> 
> Can you do `M-x describe-face RET default RET' and tell us which
> font Emacs says it's using ?
> Can you then do M-x describe-fontset RET <the name> RET and show
> us what that says ?

Maybe in a week.  Especially if you explain what is "the name" -
something from the output of describe-face?

Ilya