[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:10:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Alexander Sirotkin <demiurg@ti.com> writes:
> Meaning that for instance rxvt is 42 times faster than emacs.
>
> Well... actually I don't know what to add, these results look
> pretty bad to me. It means that I will never compile in emacs
> window and should abandon all terminals except for rxvt.
Does it help to hide the *Compilation* window (using C-x 1, say)
while the compilation is proceeding?
Another possibility would be to redirect the output to a file, then
open that file, then invoke compilation-mode or
compilation-minor-mode on that file. (If you choose a unique
filename suffix, then you can put stuff in auto-mode-alist to invoke
compilation-(minor-)mode for you, when you visit that file.)
--
A preposition is not a good thing to end a sentence with.
- scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Alexander Sirotkin, 2003/03/03
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Thomas Glanzmann, 2003/03/03
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Wayne Throop, 2003/03/03
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Måns Rullgård, 2003/03/04
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/03/04
- Re: scroll speed - emacs vs. xterm vs. rxvt, Alexander Sirotkin, 2003/03/04