[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fontification problem with PODs
From: |
Ilya Zakharevich |
Subject: |
Re: fontification problem with PODs |
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2010 20:08:58 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) |
On 2010-05-04, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
>> (But, as I said, with newer versions of Emacs I suspect one ALSO
>> needs to prune all cperl-* symbols first - there is some
>> contamination left from the bundled (pre-loaded!) version.)
>
> Which is a way of saying that the initialisation for cperl-mode isn't
> watertight. ;-)
Could you be more specific with your "watertight" adjective? How
should a module writer deal with a possibility to have a buggy version
preloaded?
[And keep in mind that I have no clue how `defvar' should work with
preloaded modules]
Yours,
Ilya
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/05/04
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/05/04
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, LanX, 2010/05/04
- Re: fontification problem with PODs,
Ilya Zakharevich <=
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/05/06
- Message not available
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/06
- Re: fontification problem with PODs, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/05/08