[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ediff refinement issues
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: ediff refinement issues |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:20:23 -0700 |
On 2011-11-26, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> Are you sure that the paragraphs themselves have only whitespace
> differences?
Yes of course. I want ^;;; or ^# to act as whitespace in this case.
It is possible that those variables (which are in the Customization
section of the ediff manual) are insufficient to do what I want here.
It is possible that I need a new ediff-forward-word-function (which is
also in that section).
One issue is that I want only ^;;; or ^# to be treated as whitespace.
Not ;;; or # in the middle of text.
It is really simple. I don't see why I should have to look at
highlighted spurious things when all I did was fill a paragraph.
> You say that `;;;' is highlighted as different. Do you mean that the `;;;'
> is
> highlighted in both of these identical lines?
>
> ;;; commented line
>
> ;;; commented line
No, because they are identical. But if you had an unfilled paragraph
there instead of a single line, and ediffed the filled and unfilled
versions, you might understand.
> 2. They are buffer-local.
What ediff hook works best here?
Re: ediff refinement issues, Peter Münster, 2011/11/26