Re: "fall-through" generic function args plus &context

[Stefan Monnier]

> Perhaps fundamental-mode should work, but I intuitively tried (&context
> (major-mode nil)) and (&context (major-mode t)).

By "should" I meant that it's a bug that neither works.

> Also, so far as I can tell, the correct function signature for the
> defgeneric should be (&context (major-mode t)), is that correct?
> At least, that didn't raise any errors.

cl-defgeneric doesn't actually pay attention to the signature you provide.


        Stefan