[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:40:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2018-04-10, at 20:32, Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com> wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>> So let me tell you that while I'm not
>> a prolific author with respect to journal
>> papers, I can attest to this: not only
>> copyediting in the TUGboat is superb, but
>> (contrary to most scientific journals
>> I published my papers in) it is _existent_
>> at all.
>
> Aha, you mean it like that. I meant it is
> normal with mistakes in any text. You have
> a mental image of what you want to convey.
> When you read the text, the mental image gets
> the upper hand and while you think you are
> reading the text, you are actually surfing the
> mental image. So the extreme case is reading
> a crap text thinking it's great.
Well, that I know too well...
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08