[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs)
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs) |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:14:49 +0700 |
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 19:56, Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU
Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Emacs Lisp is good enough to generate passwords just like
> > `pwgen'
>
> Are there some agreed-upon, formal requirements to
> a password generator?
The first rule of password generators is to use a crypto quality
randomness generator. Which, as far as I can tell, Elisp’s ‘random’ is
not, at least unless you do a ‘(random t)’ first. And maybe not even
then.
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), (continued)
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/21
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2021/10/21
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/21
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs),
Yuri Khan <=
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Yuri Khan, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/22
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/23
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/24
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/24
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/24
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2021/10/24
- Re: Noob dumb question (extending emacs), Jean Louis, 2021/10/25