[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: min-colors 88
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: min-colors 88 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:19:26 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:55:39 +0100 (CET)
> From: fatiparty@tutanota.com
> Cc: Help Gnu Emacs <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>
> >> That would not mean that #d166ff actually exists for 256 colour
> >> availability.
> >>
> >
> > It doesn't matter. Emacs will find a color that is the closest to
> > that RGB value, and use it. See tty-colors.el.
> >
>
> Are there more colours available than those in the color-name-rgb-alist ?
On some displays, perhaps. But why is that important?
- min-colors 88, (continued)
- Re: min-colors 88, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/27
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- min-colors 88, fatiparty, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/28
- Re: min-colors 88, Emanuel Berg, 2022/01/27