[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2022 15:38:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> writes:
> > It warns about transposed interactive spec and docstring - a programmer
> > error.
>
> In the original post, the order is the same in both examples — first
> the docstring, then the interactive spec, then the body forms. I do
> not understand why one would cause a warning but not the other.
That doesn't happen for these examples AFAICT. These were only
skeletons, however. I didn't follow who compiled what, I only tried to
explain the intention of the warnings.
You also get such a warning for a function with an interactive spec but
an empty body. Maybe that had happened to someone.
Michael.
- Re: docstrings (was: Prefix Argument and optional argument), (continued)
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Stefan Monnier, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Emanuel Berg, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Jean Louis, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Christopher Dimech, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument, Yuri Khan, 2022/07/07
- Re: Prefix Argument and optional argument,
Michael Heerdegen <=