[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions about "guix pull"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Questions about "guix pull" |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:17:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Chris Marusich <address@hidden> skribis:
> I have read the Info node "(guix) Invoking guix pull", but it doesn't
> seem to answer the following questions:
>
> - Who is allowed to run "guix pull"? Only root? Any user?
>
> - After a successful "guix pull", are the new guix tools and package
> definitions visible to everyone, regardless of who ran the command?
I’ve added a paragraph to clarify that:
Any user can update their Guix copy using @command{guix pull}, and the
effect is limited to the user who run @command{guix pull}. For
instance, when user @code{root} runs @command{guix pull}, this has no
effect on the version of Guix that user @code{alice} sees, and vice
address@hidden the hood, @command{guix pull} updates the
@file{~/.config/guix/latest} symbolic link to point to the latest Guix,
and the @command{guix} command loads code from there.}.
> - Are there any best practices, or pitfalls to avoid, when using "guix
> pull"?
Currently ‘guix pull’ updates only the Scheme part of Guix, which is
certainly the most important thing but not the only thing: see
<http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22629>.
> - I understand that some people don't use "guix pull" and instead just
> run guix from a local git checkout. Should the manual also explain why
> you might want to do that and how it can be done?
I think this is mostly due to the fact that (1) many users are also Guix
developers, so they have a Git checkout around anyway ;-), (2) using the
Git checkout is usually faster (currently ‘guix pull’ redownloads the
whole thing.)
There’s also the problem that ‘guix pull’ does not authenticate the code
it downloads; the problem is also present with Git, though (currently
only release tags are signed in Guix.) All this needs to be fixed!
> I'm happy to submit a patch to improve this Info node, but I need to
> understand "guix pull" first.
Sure!
Thanks for your feedback,
Ludo’.