help-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make check never finishes


From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: make check never finishes
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 17:40:20 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2

Hi Soren,

I received your E-mail two times from help-guix@gnu.org, with these
timestamps:

Tue, 16 May 2023 14:54:21 -0600 (18 hours, 46 minutes, 37 seconds ago)
Wed, 17 May 2023 06:54:34 -0700 (1 hour, 46 minutes, 38 seconds ago)

So your messages are received and delivered to the list.  Maybe somebody
has fixed an issue in the meanwhile, but delays do sometimes happen
because of some different handshakes between the mail servers,
graylisting, or whatnot.

I cannot help you with the original issue about make check, sorry.

-
Sergiu


Soren Stoutner via <help-guix@gnu.org> [2023-05-17T16:47:56+0200]:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> GNU Mailman,
>
> The email below silently fails to send to help-guix@gnu.org.  It never posts 
> to the mailing list and I receive no bounce message.
>
>
> -- Original Email --
>
> I am new to GNU Guix.  In my attempts to build Guix I run into a problem 
> where `make check` never finishes.  The last check to complete is the 
> following:
>
> PASS: tests/guix-pack-localstatedir.sh
>
> I think the problem happens while processing guix-pack-relocatable.sh.  
> The final lines of guix-pack-relocatable.log are the following:
>
>
> The following derivations will be built:
>    
> /gnu/store/6nbb5kb2wj2lja5s77qckvfnabsf786s-sed-tarball-pack.tar.gz.drv
>    /gnu/store/xd5xhbpcgcmy1cvypw4qhag17gbll4lh-profile-directory.drv
>    /gnu/store/s2c4kin834znnc56s4bhy32pqw5vnbiv-profile.drv
>    /gnu/store/g4xjkpaicqmi23nfhp0qhja4c92s5wcz-sed-4.8R.drv
>    /gnu/store/q323ryqh9wa4vinx8d0v3gqmw8lvv119-proot-static-5.3.0.drv
>
> building 
> /gnu/store/q323ryqh9wa4vinx8d0v3gqmw8lvv119-proot-static-5.3.0.drv...
>
>
>
> The CPU hits 100% and stays there for days with no further progress.
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas of what might be wrong?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]