[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: same package defined in multiple channels?
|
From: |
Irfan S |
|
Subject: |
Re: same package defined in multiple channels? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 00:34:56 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Andy Tai <atai@atai.org> writes:
> Hi, thanks. What if it is the case of the same package, same version, but
> say j\ust differs in configure, compile or link flags (from
> multiple definitions)?
The convention I’ve seen is to define such package variants under different
names, e.g emacs and emacs-xwidgets. I do not know guix or guile enough to say
what would happen if that convention were not followed.